The State of Translation Automation 2026 · Languages

English to Belarusian AI translation quality, cost and speed

What it takes to automate translation from English into Belarusian against 10 requirements in three levels: the solutions that meet them, what they cost and how fast they are, from the 2026 benchmark of 57 AI models and MT engines.

How good is AI translation from English to Belarusian?

Key findings on English to Belarusian translation

  1. 1Price vs qualityThe three one-step solutions that meet every Standard requirement in Belarusian all have 19.8 weighted errors per 1,000 words. They cost $5.41 per million characters on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, $8.45 on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol and $32.09 on Anthropic Claude Fable 5.See the data →
  2. 2Near missThe one-step solution on Google Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 16 seconds per 1,000 words in Belarusian, at $4.05 per million characters. It misses general translation quality with 24.1 weighted errors per 1,000 words, and tag handling with 99.2% of the tags right.See the data →
  3. 3Trade-offWith the gender-neutrality agent, the two-step solution (translation + post-edit) on Anthropic Claude Fable 5 meets every Advanced requirement at $77.04 per million characters with 15.5 total errors per 1,000 words, and the three-step one (translation + LQA + repair) on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol at $982 with 7.9.See the data →

Find English to Belarusian translation solutions for your requirements

Pick a quality level, or your own requirements, bars and constraints, to see the shortlisted solutions that meet them in Belarusian, with a column for each requirement you select. Under Optimize for, choose which of them comes first: the one with the fewest total errors, the lowest cost or the shortest time. Click a column heading to sort by it.

The shortlisted solutions on 11 models, with their Intento LQA results. Total errors per 1,000 words add the weighted general translation quality errors (minor 1, major 5, critical 10) to the missed glossary terms, sentences in the wrong register, tag errors and sentences that fail gender neutrality, each counted once. Formatting counts as met or missed and does not add to the total errors. The models that did not make the shortlist have automatic scores only: the shortlist. Gender neutrality: the Advanced requirements count the two best solutions of the language, with the gender-neutrality agent where they need it. The results of the other solutions are shown for information.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 11-02

Trade-offs in English to Belarusian translation

Trade-off

Four solutions meet every Standard requirement in Belarusian, and none leads on errors, cost and time. For quality, three tie at 22.2 total errors per 1,000 words: the three-step solution (translation + LQA + repair) on z.ai GLM-5, at $600 per million characters, and the one-step solutions on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Anthropic Claude Fable 5. For cost, Optimize for selects the one on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, at $5.41 per million characters, and for latency the one on Anthropic Claude Fable 5, at 96 seconds per 1,000 words.

Constraints

A cost cap under $5.41 per million characters or a time limit of at most 95 seconds per 1,000 words removes all four solutions that meet every Standard requirement in Belarusian. A limit of one step drops the three-step solution (translation + LQA + repair) on z.ai GLM-5, and two of the three left have the same 22.2 total errors per 1,000 words. Under the Advanced requirements, a cost cap of at most $77.03 per million characters, a time limit under 181 seconds per 1,000 words or a limit of one step removes both solutions that meet them.

Agent effect

For the Advanced requirements, the gender-neutrality agent raises the cost of the three-step solution (translation + LQA + repair) on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol from $608 to $982 per million characters. Its total errors fall from 10.4 to 7.9 per 1,000 words, and its time is 238 seconds per 1,000 words against 259. With the agent, the total errors of the two-step solution (translation + post-edit) on Anthropic Claude Fable 5 fall from 19.5 to 15.5 per 1,000 words, and its time is 181 seconds per 1,000 words against 183.

English to Belarusian translation quality levels

Optimize for
Basic requirements★★★☆

Tier 1: simple solution + backup

Solutions that meet them
4 (3 one-step)
Simplest solution
one-step
Fewest errors

z.ai GLM-5
three-step

Tied with Anthropic Claude Fable 5 (one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements) and Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements).

Total errors per 1,000 words
22.2
Cost per million characters
$600
Seconds per 1,000 words
446
Lowest cost

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
22.2
Cost per million characters
$5.41
Seconds per 1,000 words
97
Shortest time

Anthropic Claude Fable 5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
22.2
Cost per million characters
$32.09
Seconds per 1,000 words
96
Standard requirements★★★☆

Tier 1: simple solution + backup

Solutions that meet them
4 (3 one-step)
Simplest solution
one-step
Fewest errors

z.ai GLM-5
three-step

Tied with Anthropic Claude Fable 5 (one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements) and Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements).

Total errors per 1,000 words
22.2
Cost per million characters
$600
Seconds per 1,000 words
446
Lowest cost

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
22.2
Cost per million characters
$5.41
Seconds per 1,000 words
97
Shortest time

Anthropic Claude Fable 5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
22.2
Cost per million characters
$32.09
Seconds per 1,000 words
96
Advanced requirements☆☆

Tier 2: two or more solutions, none simple

Solutions that meet them
2 (0 one-step)
Simplest solution
with the gender-neutrality agent
Fewest errors

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol
three-step with the gender-neutrality agent

Total errors per 1,000 words
7.9
Cost per million characters
$982
Seconds per 1,000 words
238
Lowest cost

Anthropic Claude Fable 5
two-step with the gender-neutrality agent

Total errors per 1,000 words
15.5
Cost per million characters
$77.04
Seconds per 1,000 words
181
Shortest time

Anthropic Claude Fable 5
two-step with the gender-neutrality agent

Total errors per 1,000 words
15.5
Cost per million characters
$77.04
Seconds per 1,000 words
181

Optimize for selects one of the solutions that meet the level: the one with the fewest total errors, the lowest cost or the shortest time. Where no solution meets the level, the card shows the available solution with the fewest total errors and what it misses. Total errors count every requirement with countable errors.

Quality levelTierSolutionsSimplest solutionModelTotal errors per 1,000 wordsCost per million charactersSeconds per 1,000 words
BasicTier 1: simple solution + backup★★★ ☆one-stepGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview22.2$5.4197
StandardTier 1: simple solution + backup★★★ ☆one-stepGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview22.2$5.4197
AdvancedTier 2: two or more solutions, none simple☆☆with the gender-neutrality agentAnthropic Claude Fable 515.5$77.04181

One solution per level: the simplest that meets the level, the cheapest of them where several are equally simple. ★ a one-step solution, ☆ a solution with more steps or the gender-neutrality agent.

Level step-up

In Belarusian the same four solutions meet every Basic and every Standard requirement, so Optimize for selects the same solutions at both levels. The Advanced requirements remove all four and leave two solutions with the gender-neutrality agent. Optimize for then selects the two-step solution (translation + post-edit) on Anthropic Claude Fable 5 for cost and latency, and the three-step solution (translation + LQA + repair) on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol for quality.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 11-02 · 08-09

English to Belarusian translation cost against errors

Chart data
Cost and weighted errors of the one-step solutions in Belarusian
ModelUS dollars per million charactersWeighted errors per 1,000 wordsGroup
z.ai GLM-52.432Misses a Standard requirement
OpenAI GPT-4.13.3948.8Misses a Standard requirement
Yandex Cloud Translate v23.94143.7Misses a Standard requirement
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash4.0524.1Misses a Standard requirement
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview5.4119.8Meets every Standard requirement
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol8.4519.8Meets every Standard requirement
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.68.9540.9Misses a Standard requirement
Google Translation LLM21.0970.5Misses a Standard requirement
Translated Lara 224.9964.3Misses a Standard requirement
DeepL Next Gen27.556.4Misses a Standard requirement
Anthropic Claude Fable 532.0919.8Meets every Standard requirement
Price vs quality

Among the one-step solutions in Belarusian, those on the three LLM-based MT engines cost $21.09 to $27.50 per million characters, more than every LLM solution but the one on Anthropic Claude Fable 5. They have 56.4 to 70.5 weighted errors per 1,000 words, more than any LLM solution. The cheapest, on z.ai GLM-5 and OpenAI GPT-4.1, cost $2.40 and $3.39 per million characters and have 32.0 and 48.8 weighted errors per 1,000 words.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 10-10

English to Belarusian translation requirements

Chart data
Errors per 1,000 words of the one-step solutions in Belarusian, median, by requirement
RequirementMedian errors per 1,000 words
General translation quality40.9
Gender neutrality2.8
Terminology0
Tone of voice0
Tag handling0

The requirements with countable errors. Every solution with its result on each requirement: the explorer.

Bottleneck

In Belarusian, the one-step solutions that miss general translation quality have 24.1 to 143.7 weighted errors per 1,000 words. On z.ai GLM-5, the one-step solution has 32.0 weighted errors per 1,000 words, the two-step solution (translation + post-edit) 32.3 and the three-step solution (translation + LQA + repair) 19.1, under the bar. In one step, 100% of the glossary terms are right in the translations from six out of seven shortlisted LLMs, and 45.9% to 97.5% in those from the four MT engines, three of them LLM-based.

How we measure it: 09-09 · 09-10 · 09-11 · 09-12 · 09-18

AI models and MT engines for English to Belarusian translation

Chart data
Weighted errors per 1,000 words of the shortlisted one-step solutions in Belarusian
ModelWeighted errors per 1,000 words of the shortlisted one-step solutions in BelarusianClass
Yandex Cloud Translate v2143.7MT engines
Google Translation LLM70.5LLM-based MT engines
Translated Lara 264.3LLM-based MT engines
DeepL Next Gen56.4LLM-based MT engines
OpenAI GPT-4.148.8LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.640.9LLMs
z.ai GLM-532LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash24.1LLMs
Anthropic Claude Fable 519.8LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol19.8LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview19.8LLMs

No translation into Belarusian: SpeakLeash Bielik-11B-v3.0-Instruct (wrong language, wrong script).

Model types

In one step, translations from the seven shortlisted LLMs have 19.8 to 48.8 weighted errors per 1,000 words in Belarusian, those from the three LLM-based MT engines 56.4 to 70.5, and those from Yandex Cloud Translate v2, the one other MT engine, 143.7. Among them, only translations from Google Translation LLM and Yandex Cloud Translate v2 have critical errors, 9 and 1. All seven LLMs support Belarusian by our measured criteria. The output of SpeakLeash Bielik-11B-v3.0-Instruct came back in the wrong language and script.

How we measure it: 00-04 · 08-15 · 23-01

How we shortlisted English to Belarusian translation solutions

Chart data
Ranks of the models on the two automatic metrics, Belarusian
ModelCOMET-KiwiRank on COMET-KiwiMetricXRank on MetricXShortlistedShortlist place
OpenAI GPT-5.50.77791.5510NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.80.776111.5611NoNot shortlisted
Mistral Large 30.776121.5712NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 50.772131.7115NoNot shortlisted
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.50.770141.5913NoNot shortlisted
DeepSeek V3.20.769151.7816NoNot shortlisted
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)0.767161.8017NoNot shortlisted
Mistral Medium 3.10.766171.8919NoNot shortlisted
Google Gemma 40.765181.9220NoNot shortlisted
Cohere Command A Translate0.753211.9621NoNot shortlisted
OpenAI gpt-oss-120b0.748222.0622NoNot shortlisted
MiniMax M2.50.744232.2823NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.50.728242.4425NoNot shortlisted
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B0.727252.6326NoNot shortlisted
ModernMT Enterprise Edition0.717262.4224NoNot shortlisted
Google Cloud Advanced Translation API0.713273.1227NoNot shortlisted
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-25090.632284.7928NoNot shortlisted
AI21 Jamba Large 1.70.463298.7629NoNot shortlisted
Alibaba Machine Translation API0.2853013.8430NoNot shortlisted
AppTek NMT0.1923116.9631NoNot shortlisted
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol0.78611.331YesTop 8 by both metrics
Anthropic Claude Fable 50.78221.424YesTop 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-4.10.78131.528YesTop 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash0.78041.465YesTop 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview0.78051.496YesTop 8 by both metrics
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.60.77961.362YesTop 8 by both metrics
z.ai GLM-50.77971.539YesTop 8 by COMET-Kiwi
Google Translation LLM0.77881.6814YesTop 8 by COMET-Kiwi
DeepL Next Gen0.777101.373YesTop 8 by MetricX
Yandex Cloud Translate v20.760191.517YesTop 8 by MetricX
Translated Lara 20.760201.8918YesReal-time place
ModelSolution complexityCOMET-Kiwi rankCOMET-KiwiMetricX rankMetricXShortlist
OpenAI GPT-5.6 SolAdjusted LLM10.78611.33Top 8 by both metrics
Anthropic Claude Fable 5Adjusted LLM20.78241.42Top 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-4.1Adjusted LLM30.78181.52Top 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.5 FlashAdjusted LLM40.78051.46Top 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewAdjusted LLM50.78061.49Top 8 by both metrics
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6Adjusted LLM60.77921.36Top 8 by both metrics
z.ai GLM-5Adjusted LLM70.77991.53Top 8 by COMET-Kiwi
Google Translation LLMOff-the-shelf NMT80.778141.68Top 8 by COMET-Kiwi
OpenAI GPT-5.5Adjusted LLM90.777101.55Not shortlisted
DeepL Next GenOff-the-shelf NMT100.77731.37Top 8 by MetricX
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8Adjusted LLM110.776111.56Not shortlisted
Mistral Large 3Adjusted LLM120.776121.57Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5Adjusted LLM130.772151.71Not shortlisted
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5Adjusted LLM140.770131.59Not shortlisted
DeepSeek V3.2Adjusted LLM150.769161.78Not shortlisted
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)Adjusted LLM160.767171.80Not shortlisted
Mistral Medium 3.1Adjusted LLM170.766191.89Not shortlisted
Google Gemma 4Adjusted LLM180.765201.92Not shortlisted
Yandex Cloud Translate v2Off-the-shelf NMT190.76071.51Top 8 by MetricX
Translated Lara 2Adjusted NMT200.760181.89Real-time place
Cohere Command A TranslateAdjusted LLM210.753211.96Not shortlisted
OpenAI gpt-oss-120bAdjusted LLM220.748222.06Not shortlisted
MiniMax M2.5Adjusted LLM230.744232.28Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Adjusted LLM240.728252.44Not shortlisted
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22BAdjusted LLM250.727262.63Not shortlisted
ModernMT Enterprise EditionAdjusted NMT260.717242.42Not shortlisted
Google Cloud Advanced Translation APIAdjusted NMT270.713273.12Not shortlisted
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-2509Adjusted LLM280.632284.79Not shortlisted
AI21 Jamba Large 1.7Adjusted LLM290.463298.76Not shortlisted
Alibaba Machine Translation APIOff-the-shelf NMT300.2853013.84Not shortlisted
AppTek NMTOff-the-shelf NMT310.1923116.96Not shortlisted
OpenAI GPT-5.6 LunaAdjusted LLM—0.780—1.52Same model family as OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI GPT-5.6 TerraAdjusted LLM—0.781—1.57Same model family as OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)Adjusted LLM—0.765—1.78Same model family as xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)

Every model we got a translation from, as the shortlist compared it: off the shelf, without context in the request, or adjusted, with it. A model that did not make the shortlist is shown adjusted, unless off the shelf it scores higher by 0.03 or more on COMET-Kiwi. Ranks among 31 models, with each model family counted once, and the top 8 of each metric in bold. Higher is better on COMET-Kiwi, lower on MetricX. The scores rank models within this language and are not a requirement result.

Metrics vs LQA

MetricX ranks Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 second and DeepL Next Gen third in Belarusian. By Intento LQA, their one-step solutions have 40.9 and 56.4 weighted errors per 1,000 words, against 19.8 for Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, fifth on COMET-Kiwi and sixth on MetricX. COMET-Kiwi alone brought z.ai GLM-5 onto the list, and its three-step solution (translation + LQA + repair) meets every Standard requirement. Nearest the cut in the tail is OpenAI GPT-5.5, ninth on COMET-Kiwi.

How we measure it: 00-08 · 00-09

English to Belarusian translation cost

Quality levelCheapest solution that meets every requirement of the levelCost per million characters
BasicGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements$5.41
StandardGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements$5.41
AdvancedAnthropic Claude Fable 5, two-step with the gender-neutrality agent$77.04
Chart data
Cost of the shortlisted one-step solutions in Belarusian
ModelUS dollars per million charactersClass
z.ai GLM-5$2.4LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.1$3.39LLMs
Yandex Cloud Translate v2$3.94MT engines
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash$4.05LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$5.41LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol$8.45LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6$8.95LLMs
Google Translation LLM$21.09LLM-based MT engines
Translated Lara 2$24.99LLM-based MT engines
DeepL Next Gen$27.5LLM-based MT engines
Anthropic Claude Fable 5$32.09LLMs
Chart data
Tokens per character of the translation into Belarusian, by model
ModelTokens per characterClass
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 50.528LLMs
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.80.524LLMs
Anthropic Claude Fable 50.523LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.60.495LLMs
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B0.494Open-weight LLMs
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.50.494LLMs
Mistral Medium 3.10.494LLMs
Mistral Large 30.492LLMs
DeepSeek V3.20.44LLMs
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.50.438LLMs
z.ai GLM-50.423LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)0.415LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)0.412LLMs
MiniMax M2.50.389LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview0.374LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash0.374LLMs
Google Gemma 40.372Open-weight LLMs
Cohere Command A Translate0.366LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol0.34LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra0.339LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna0.338LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.50.337LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.10.336LLMs
AI21 Jamba Large 1.70.322LLMs
Cost driver

With billing on tokens, the tokenizers produce a median 0.41 tokens per character of a translation into Belarusian, 1.6 times their count for English. On one model, the cost follows the steps. The solutions on z.ai GLM-5 cost $2.40 per million characters in one step, $5.48 in two steps (translation + post-edit) and $600 in three steps (translation + LQA + repair). Those on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol cost $8.45 per million characters in one step and $608 in three steps.

How we measure it: 10-01 · 10-03 · 05-02

English to Belarusian translation speed

Quality levelFastest solution that meets every requirement of the levelSeconds per 1,000 words
BasicAnthropic Claude Fable 5, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements96
StandardAnthropic Claude Fable 5, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements96
AdvancedAnthropic Claude Fable 5, two-step with the gender-neutrality agent181
Chart data
Time to translate 1,000 words into Belarusian, by model
ModelSeconds per 1,000 wordsClass
Google Translation LLM0.4LLM-based MT engines
Google Cloud Advanced Translation API0.5MT engines
DeepL Next Gen0.7LLM-based MT engines
ModernMT Enterprise Edition1MT engines
Translated Lara 21.8LLM-based MT engines
OpenAI gpt-oss-120b2.7Open-weight LLMs
Yandex Cloud Translate v24.8MT engines
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash16LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna17LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.124LLMs
Alibaba Machine Translation API27MT engines
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)31LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra45LLMs
DeepSeek V3.249LLMs
Mistral Medium 3.153LLMs
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.555LLMs
Cohere Command A Translate57LLMs
MiniMax M2.558LLMs
AI21 Jamba Large 1.771LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)77LLMs
Mistral Large 378LLMs
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-250986Open-weight LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 590LLMs
AppTek NMT91MT engines
Anthropic Claude Fable 596LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview97LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.5108LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol114LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6114LLMs
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8123LLMs
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B163Open-weight LLMs
Google Gemma 4220Open-weight LLMs
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5251LLMs
z.ai GLM-5267LLMs

Real-time models are those the shortlist counts as real-time, under 2 seconds per text across the languages we timed. The chart shows the time of each model into Belarusian.

Real-time

The six real-time models in Belarusian are two MT engines, three LLM-based MT engines and the open-weight OpenAI gpt-oss-120b. Three are on the shortlist, DeepL Next Gen, Google Translation LLM and Translated Lara 2, and their translations have 56.4 to 70.5 weighted errors per 1,000 words. None of the three meet general translation quality or terminology. From the Standard to the Advanced requirements, the time of the fastest solution goes from 96 to 181 seconds per 1,000 words.

How we measure it: 12-01 · 12-02 · 12-09

Tone of voice and gender-neutral English to Belarusian translation

Tone of voice
Formal register, with вы
Gender-neutrality strategy
neutral rephrasing + plurals/impersonals
Options in the language
generic masculine, feminine pairing or slash forms, neutral rephrasing
Default gender
None where the source leaves the gender open
The two best solutionsSolutionSentences about people that are gender-neutralMeets every Advanced requirementCost per million charactersSeconds per 1,000 words
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Solthree-step, with the gender-neutrality agent100%✓$982238
Anthropic Claude Fable 5two-step, with the gender-neutrality agent100%✓$77.04181
Analysis

For Belarusian we check the formal register, with вы, and gender-neutral wording through neutral rephrasing, plurals and impersonal forms, with no default gender. The one-step solutions have a median 2.8 gender-neutrality errors per 1,000 words. The two best solutions, the two-step one (translation + post-edit) on Anthropic Claude Fable 5 and the three-step one (translation + LQA + repair) on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol, work with the gender-neutrality agent. In their translations, 100% of the sentences about people are gender-neutral.

How we measure it: 02-05 · 02-06 · 08-11 · 09-18

How confident are we in measuring English to Belarusian translation quality?

Confidence

For the 11 shortlisted solutions in Belarusian, the median share of sentences on which the three LQA judges agree is 94.9%. With agreement that high, the Intento LQA error counts of these 11 solutions are reliable.

How we measure it: 00-07 · 07-05 · 09-02

Automate translation to meet your requirements

See Intento Language Hub in action.

Book a demo
Leave feedback