The State of Translation Automation 2026 · Languages

English to Malay AI translation quality, cost and speed

What it takes to automate translation from English into Malay against 10 requirements in three levels: the solutions that meet them, what they cost and how fast they are, from the 2026 benchmark of 57 AI models and MT engines.

How good is AI translation from English to Malay?

Key findings on English to Malay translation

  1. 1Near missThe solution on OpenAI GPT-4.1 misses general translation quality in Malay by a small margin: its translations have 21.4 weighted errors per 1,000 words, just over the bar, with no critical or major error. It meets tone of voice, tag handling and formatting.See the data →
  2. 2Metrics vs LQAThe solution with the fewest errors by Intento LQA, on OpenAI GPT-5.5, is 8th on COMET-Kiwi and 11th on MetricX, so it made the shortlist through COMET-Kiwi alone. Translations from Cohere Command A Translate, 2nd on COMET-Kiwi, have 42.2 weighted errors per 1,000 words.See the data →

Find English to Malay translation solutions for your requirements

Pick a quality level, or your own requirements, bars and constraints, to see the shortlisted solutions that meet them in Malay, with a column for each requirement you select. Under Optimize for, choose which of them comes first: the one with the fewest total errors, the lowest cost or the shortest time. Click a column heading to sort by it.

The shortlisted solutions on 11 models, with their Intento LQA results. Total errors per 1,000 words add the weighted general translation quality errors (minor 1, major 5, critical 10) to the missed glossary terms, sentences in the wrong register, tag errors and sentences that fail gender neutrality, each counted once. Formatting counts as met or missed and does not add to the total errors. The models that did not make the shortlist have automatic scores only: the shortlist. Inconclusive: the three LQA judges agree on fewer than 90% of the sentences of the solution, so it has no general translation quality result (09-02). Gender neutrality: the Advanced requirements count the two best solutions of the language, with the gender-neutrality agent where they need it. The results of the other solutions are shown for information.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 11-02

Trade-offs in English to Malay translation

Trade-off

Three one-step solutions meet every Standard requirement in Malay, and none leads on errors, cost and time at once. The one on OpenAI GPT-5.5 has the fewest total errors, 10.9 per 1,000 words, but costs $9.82 per million characters and takes 50 seconds per 1,000 words. The one on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, with 12.2 total errors per 1,000 words, is the cheapest and ties as the fastest, at 13 seconds per 1,000 words, with the one on Google Gemini 3.5 Flash, which has more errors than either.

Constraints

Among these three, a cost cap or a time limit under those of the solution on OpenAI GPT-5.5, $9.82 per million characters and 50 seconds per 1,000 words, removes it. A cap under $2.92 per million characters also removes the one on Google Gemini 3.5 Flash. A cap or a limit under those of the one on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, $0.39 per million characters and 13 seconds per 1,000 words, removes all three. All three take one step, so a limit on the steps removes none.

Agent effect

Translations from the two best solutions in Malay have 100% of the sentences about people gender-neutral without the gender-neutrality agent. So the Advanced requirements add nothing to their cost, time or total errors. The cheapest solution that meets every Advanced requirement is the one on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, at $0.39 per million characters, as for the Standard requirements, and it is also the fastest.

English to Malay translation quality levels

Optimize for
Basic requirements★★★

Tier 1: simple solution + backup

Solutions that meet them
3 (3 one-step)
Simplest solution
one-step
Fewest errors

OpenAI GPT-5.5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
10.9
Cost per million characters
$9.82
Seconds per 1,000 words
50
Lowest cost

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
12.2
Cost per million characters
$0.39
Seconds per 1,000 words
13
Shortest time

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Tied with Google Gemini 3.5 Flash (one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements).

Total errors per 1,000 words
12.2
Cost per million characters
$0.39
Seconds per 1,000 words
13
Standard requirements★★★

Tier 1: simple solution + backup

Solutions that meet them
3 (3 one-step)
Simplest solution
one-step
Fewest errors

OpenAI GPT-5.5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
10.9
Cost per million characters
$9.82
Seconds per 1,000 words
50
Lowest cost

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
12.2
Cost per million characters
$0.39
Seconds per 1,000 words
13
Shortest time

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Tied with Google Gemini 3.5 Flash (one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements).

Total errors per 1,000 words
12.2
Cost per million characters
$0.39
Seconds per 1,000 words
13
Advanced requirements★★

Tier 1: simple solution + backup

Solutions that meet them
2 (2 one-step)
Simplest solution
one-step
Fewest errors

OpenAI GPT-5.5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
10.9
Cost per million characters
$9.82
Seconds per 1,000 words
50
Lowest cost

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
12.2
Cost per million characters
$0.39
Seconds per 1,000 words
13
Shortest time

OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
12.2
Cost per million characters
$0.39
Seconds per 1,000 words
13

Optimize for selects one of the solutions that meet the level: the one with the fewest total errors, the lowest cost or the shortest time. Where no solution meets the level, the card shows the available solution with the fewest total errors and what it misses. Total errors count every requirement with countable errors.

Quality levelTierSolutionsSimplest solutionModelTotal errors per 1,000 wordsCost per million charactersSeconds per 1,000 words
BasicTier 1: simple solution + backup★★★one-stepOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna12.2$0.3913
StandardTier 1: simple solution + backup★★★one-stepOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna12.2$0.3913
AdvancedTier 1: simple solution + backup★★one-stepOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna12.2$0.3913

One solution per level: the simplest that meets the level, the cheapest of them where several are equally simple. ★ a one-step solution, ☆ a solution with more steps or the gender-neutrality agent.

Level step-up

The three solutions that meet every Basic requirement in Malay also meet every Standard requirement. Two of them, on OpenAI GPT-5.5 and OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, meet every Advanced requirement too. Each level takes a single step. At all three levels, Optimize for selects the solution on OpenAI GPT-5.5 for quality and the one on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna for cost and latency, where under the Basic and Standard requirements it ties with the one on Google Gemini 3.5 Flash at 13 seconds per 1,000 words.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 11-02 · 08-09

English to Malay translation cost against errors

Chart data
Cost and weighted errors of the one-step solutions in Malay
ModelUS dollars per million charactersWeighted errors per 1,000 wordsGroup
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna0.3912.2Meets every Standard requirement
Mistral Large 30.836.3Misses a Standard requirement
OpenAI GPT-4.12.7721.4Misses a Standard requirement
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash2.9217.5Meets every Standard requirement
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.66.6826.4Misses a Standard requirement
OpenAI GPT-5.59.8210.9Meets every Standard requirement
DeepL Next Gen27.540.9Misses a Standard requirement
Price vs quality

A higher price does not on its own mean fewer errors among the one-step solutions in Malay. The cost and errors front holds two LLM solutions, on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna and OpenAI GPT-5.5. Among the one-step solutions with a cost, the one on Mistral Large 3 is the second cheapest, at $0.80 per million characters. It has 36.3 weighted errors per 1,000 words. The one on DeepL Next Gen costs $27.50 per million characters and has 40.9 weighted errors per 1,000 words.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 10-10

English to Malay translation requirements

Chart data
Errors per 1,000 words of the one-step solutions in Malay, median, by requirement
RequirementMedian errors per 1,000 words
General translation quality26.4
Tone of voice0
Tag handling0
Gender neutrality0

The requirements with countable errors. Every solution with its result on each requirement: the explorer.

Bottleneck

General translation quality holds back most of the shortlist in Malay. Over its bar, the solution on OpenAI GPT-4.1 has 21.4 weighted errors per 1,000 words and the one on Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 26.4. The other four solutions over the bar have 36.3 to 43.5 weighted errors per 1,000 words. A solution meets tag handling with 100% of the tags right. Translations from OpenAI gpt-oss-120b have 99.6% of the tags right, from Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 99.2%, from DeepL Next Gen 95.7% and from AI21 Jamba Large 1.7 92.3%.

How we measure it: 09-09 · 09-10 · 09-11 · 09-12 · 09-18

AI models and MT engines for English to Malay translation

Chart data
Weighted errors per 1,000 words of the shortlisted one-step solutions in Malay
ModelWeighted errors per 1,000 words of the shortlisted one-step solutions in MalayClass
OpenAI gpt-oss-120b43.5Open-weight LLMs
Cohere Command A Translate42.2LLMs
DeepL Next Gen40.9LLM-based MT engines
Mistral Large 336.3LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.626.4LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.121.4LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash17.5LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna12.2LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.510.9LLMs

No translation into Malay: Widn AI Tower Anthill (far too short, wrong language), Widn AI Tower Vesuvius (far too short, wrong language).

Model types

Model type alone does not order the results in Malay. All three solutions that meet general translation quality are on LLMs, but translations from the eight shortlisted LLMs with a conclusive result span 10.9 to 43.5 weighted errors per 1,000 words, and those from DeepL Next Gen, with 40.9, fall inside that span. The only MT engines on the shortlist are LLM-based: DeepL Next Gen and Translated Lara 2. We got no translation from Widn AI Tower Anthill and Widn AI Tower Vesuvius: their output was far too short and in the wrong language.

How we measure it: 00-04 · 08-15 · 23-01

How we shortlisted English to Malay translation solutions

Chart data
Ranks of the models on the two automatic metrics, Malay
ModelCOMET-KiwiRank on COMET-KiwiMetricXRank on MetricXShortlistedShortlist place
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview0.78791.4910NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 50.787101.5314NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.80.787111.5213NoNot shortlisted
z.ai GLM-50.787121.5615NoNot shortlisted
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)0.786131.5918NoNot shortlisted
Google Gemma 40.785161.479NoNot shortlisted
Mistral Medium 3.10.784171.7125NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Fable 50.779181.6724NoNot shortlisted
Google Translation LLM0.778201.8126NoNot shortlisted
DeepSeek V3.20.778211.5717NoNot shortlisted
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B0.778221.6222NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.50.777231.6020NoNot shortlisted
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.50.776241.5616NoNot shortlisted
Microsoft Translator0.769251.6019NoNot shortlisted
ModernMT Enterprise Edition0.762261.6021NoNot shortlisted
Google Cloud Advanced Translation API0.751272.3629NoNot shortlisted
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-25090.745282.8433NoNot shortlisted
Yandex Cloud Translate v20.745292.0827NoNot shortlisted
Tencent Cloud TMT0.741302.2828NoNot shortlisted
MiniMax M2.50.739312.4531NoNot shortlisted
Amazon Translate0.737322.3730NoNot shortlisted
SYSTRAN PNMT API0.696332.6632NoNot shortlisted
Alibaba Machine Translation API0.688343.2934NoNot shortlisted
AppTek NMT0.657353.9035NoNot shortlisted
Cohere Tiny Aya0.653365.0936NoNot shortlisted
OpenAI GPT-4.10.79411.351YesTop 8 by both metrics
Cohere Command A Translate0.79221.5212YesTop 8 by COMET-Kiwi
DeepL Next Gen0.79131.414YesTop 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash0.79141.382YesTop 8 by both metrics
OpenAI gpt-oss-120b0.79051.478YesTop 8 by both metrics
Mistral Large 30.78961.425YesTop 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna0.78871.383YesTop 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.50.78781.5111YesTop 8 by COMET-Kiwi
AI21 Jamba Large 1.70.786141.446YesTop 8 by MetricX
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.60.785151.477YesTop 8 by MetricX
Translated Lara 20.779191.6323YesReal-time place
ModelSolution complexityCOMET-Kiwi rankCOMET-KiwiMetricX rankMetricXShortlist
OpenAI GPT-4.1Adjusted LLM10.79411.35Top 8 by both metrics
Cohere Command A TranslateAdjusted LLM20.792121.52Top 8 by COMET-Kiwi
DeepL Next GenOff-the-shelf NMT30.79141.41Top 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.5 FlashAdjusted LLM40.79121.38Top 8 by both metrics
OpenAI gpt-oss-120bAdjusted LLM50.79081.47Top 8 by both metrics
Mistral Large 3Adjusted LLM60.78951.42Top 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.6 LunaAdjusted LLM70.78831.38Top 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.5Adjusted LLM80.787111.51Top 8 by COMET-Kiwi
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewAdjusted LLM90.787101.49Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5Adjusted LLM100.787141.53Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8Adjusted LLM110.787131.52Not shortlisted
z.ai GLM-5Adjusted LLM120.787151.56Not shortlisted
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)Adjusted LLM130.786181.59Not shortlisted
AI21 Jamba Large 1.7Adjusted LLM140.78661.44Top 8 by MetricX
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6Adjusted LLM150.78571.47Top 8 by MetricX
Google Gemma 4Adjusted LLM160.78591.47Not shortlisted
Mistral Medium 3.1Adjusted LLM170.784251.71Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Fable 5Adjusted LLM180.779241.67Not shortlisted
Translated Lara 2Adjusted NMT190.779231.63Real-time place
Google Translation LLMAdjusted NMT200.778261.81Not shortlisted
DeepSeek V3.2Adjusted LLM210.778171.57Not shortlisted
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22BAdjusted LLM220.778221.62Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Adjusted LLM230.777201.60Not shortlisted
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5Adjusted LLM240.776161.56Not shortlisted
Microsoft TranslatorOff-the-shelf NMT250.769191.60Not shortlisted
ModernMT Enterprise EditionOff-the-shelf NMT260.762211.60Not shortlisted
Google Cloud Advanced Translation APIOff-the-shelf NMT270.751292.36Not shortlisted
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-2509Off-the-shelf LLM280.745332.84Not shortlisted
Yandex Cloud Translate v2Off-the-shelf NMT290.745272.08Not shortlisted
Tencent Cloud TMTOff-the-shelf NMT300.741282.28Not shortlisted
MiniMax M2.5Adjusted LLM310.739312.45Not shortlisted
Amazon TranslateOff-the-shelf NMT320.737302.37Not shortlisted
SYSTRAN PNMT APIOff-the-shelf NMT330.696322.66Not shortlisted
Alibaba Machine Translation APIOff-the-shelf NMT340.688343.29Not shortlisted
AppTek NMTOff-the-shelf NMT350.657353.90Not shortlisted
Cohere Tiny AyaAdjusted LLM360.653365.09Not shortlisted
OpenAI GPT-5.6 SolAdjusted LLM—0.788—1.40Same model family as OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI GPT-5.6 TerraAdjusted LLM—0.785—1.51Same model family as OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)Adjusted LLM—0.771—1.77Same model family as xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)

Every model we got a translation from, as the shortlist compared it: off the shelf, without context in the request, or adjusted, with it. A model that did not make the shortlist is shown adjusted, unless off the shelf it scores higher by 0.03 or more on COMET-Kiwi. Ranks among 36 models, with each model family counted once, and the top 8 of each metric in bold. Higher is better on COMET-Kiwi, lower on MetricX. The scores rank models within this language and are not a requirement result.

Metrics vs LQA

The metrics and Intento LQA order the shortlist differently in Malay. The solution on OpenAI GPT-4.1, first on both metrics, misses general translation quality, while the one on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, 7th on COMET-Kiwi and 3rd on MetricX, meets every Advanced requirement. COMET-Kiwi alone brought in Cohere Command A Translate and OpenAI GPT-5.5, and MetricX alone AI21 Jamba Large 1.7 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6. Nearest the cut are Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, 9th on COMET-Kiwi, and Google Gemma 4, 9th on MetricX.

How we measure it: 00-08 · 00-09

English to Malay translation cost

Quality levelCheapest solution that meets every requirement of the levelCost per million characters
BasicOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements$0.39
StandardOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements$0.39
AdvancedOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements$0.39
Chart data
Cost of the shortlisted one-step solutions in Malay
ModelUS dollars per million charactersClass
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna$0.4LLMs
Mistral Large 3$0.8LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.1$2.77LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash$2.92LLMs
AI21 Jamba Large 1.7$3.62LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6$6.68LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.5$9.82LLMs
Translated Lara 2$24.99LLM-based MT engines
DeepL Next Gen$27.5LLM-based MT engines
Chart data
Tokens per character of the translation into Malay, by model
ModelTokens per characterClass
Anthropic Claude Fable 50.479LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 50.479LLMs
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.80.478LLMs
Mistral Medium 3.10.403LLMs
Mistral Large 30.399LLMs
AI21 Jamba Large 1.70.374LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.60.354LLMs
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.50.353LLMs
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B0.308Open-weight LLMs
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.50.307LLMs
z.ai GLM-50.302LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)0.283LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)0.283LLMs
DeepSeek V3.20.281LLMs
Cohere Command A Translate0.263LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.10.261LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra0.261LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.50.26LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna0.259LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol0.259LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview0.253LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash0.253LLMs
Google Gemma 40.251Open-weight LLMs
MiniMax M2.50.225LLMs
Cohere Tiny Aya0.217LLMs
Cost driver

The tokenizers produce a median 0.28 tokens per character of a Malay translation, 1.2 times their count for English. The three models whose solutions meet every Standard requirement have tokenizers near the low end, at 0.25 to 0.26 tokens per character. Yet their solutions cost from $0.39 to $9.82 per million characters. No level takes more than one step in Malay, so no step adds to the cost, and the cheapest solution is the same at all three levels.

How we measure it: 10-01 · 10-03 · 05-02

English to Malay translation speed

Quality levelFastest solution that meets every requirement of the levelSeconds per 1,000 words
BasicOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements13
StandardOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements13
AdvancedOpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements13
Chart data
Time to translate 1,000 words into Malay, by model
ModelSeconds per 1,000 wordsClass
Google Cloud Advanced Translation API0.1MT engines
Microsoft Translator0.2MT engines
ModernMT Enterprise Edition0.3MT engines
Google Translation LLM0.4LLM-based MT engines
DeepL Next Gen0.5LLM-based MT engines
SYSTRAN PNMT API0.9MT engines
Translated Lara 21.2LLM-based MT engines
Amazon Translate1.2MT engines
OpenAI gpt-oss-120b1.9Open-weight LLMs
Yandex Cloud Translate v22.3MT engines
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash13LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna13LLMs
Cohere Tiny Aya13LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)13LLMs
Alibaba Machine Translation API19MT engines
OpenAI GPT-4.121LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra22LLMs
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.530LLMs
DeepSeek V3.231LLMs
Cohere Command A Translate34LLMs
Mistral Medium 3.136LLMs
MiniMax M2.537LLMs
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-250938Open-weight LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)40LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 547LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol49LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.550LLMs
AI21 Jamba Large 1.750LLMs
Anthropic Claude Fable 551LLMs
Mistral Large 352LLMs
Tencent Cloud TMT55MT engines
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.860LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.660LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview76LLMs
AppTek NMT93MT engines
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B108Open-weight LLMs
Google Gemma 4122Open-weight LLMs
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5215LLMs
z.ai GLM-5590LLMs

Real-time models are those the shortlist counts as real-time, under 2 seconds per text across the languages we timed. The chart shows the time of each model into Malay.

How we measure it: 12-01 · 12-02 · 12-09

Tone of voice and gender-neutral English to Malay translation

Tone of voice
Formal register, with anda
Gender-neutrality strategy
No grammatical gender for persons — neutral by default; only avoid gendered terms
Default gender
None where the source leaves the gender open
The two best solutionsSolutionSentences about people that are gender-neutralMeets every Advanced requirementCost per million charactersSeconds per 1,000 words
OpenAI GPT-5.5one-step100%✓$9.8250
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Lunaone-step100%✓$0.3913
Analysis

In Malay we check tone of voice against the formal register, with “anda” as the form of address. For gender neutrality, a translation must not add a gender the source does not specify, and a default gender is never allowed. Malay has no grammatical gender for persons, so translations are neutral by default, as long as they have no gendered terms. Translations from all 11 shortlisted one-step solutions have 100% of their sentences in the tone of voice.

How we measure it: 02-05 · 02-06 · 08-11 · 09-18

How confident are we in measuring English to Malay translation quality?

How we measure it: 00-07 · 07-05 · 09-02

Automate translation to meet your requirements

See Intento Language Hub in action.

Book a demo
Leave feedback