The State of Translation Automation 2026 · Languages

English to Malayalam AI translation quality, cost and speed

What it takes to automate translation from English into Malayalam against 10 requirements in three levels: the solutions that meet them, what they cost and how fast they are, from the 2026 benchmark of 57 AI models and MT engines.

How good is AI translation from English to Malayalam?

Key findings on English to Malayalam translation

  1. 1Near missThe one-step solution on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol misses general translation quality in Malayalam on 4 major errors, one major error more than the requirement allows. It misses tag handling too, with 99.2% of the tags right, and meets tone of voice and formatting.See the data →
  2. 2Cost driverIn Malayalam, the one-step solution on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $5.09 per million characters and the two-step one (translation + post-edit), which meets every Standard requirement, $28.94. On OpenAI GPT-5.5, one step costs $12.60 and three steps (translation + LQA + repair) $601 per million characters.See the data →
  3. 3Metrics vs LQAMetricX ranks Google Gemini 3.5 Flash first in Malayalam, yet by Intento LQA the one-step solution on that model has 44.2 weighted errors per 1,000 words. The one on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol, second on both metrics, has 16.8 weighted errors per 1,000 words, the fewest of the 10 shortlisted one-step solutions.See the data →

Find English to Malayalam translation solutions for your requirements

Pick a quality level, or your own requirements, bars and constraints, to see the shortlisted solutions that meet them in Malayalam, with a column for each requirement you select. Under Optimize for, choose which of them comes first: the one with the fewest total errors, the lowest cost or the shortest time. Click a column heading to sort by it.

The shortlisted solutions on 10 models, with their Intento LQA results. Total errors per 1,000 words add the weighted general translation quality errors (minor 1, major 5, critical 10) to the missed glossary terms, sentences in the wrong register, tag errors and sentences that fail gender neutrality, each counted once. Formatting counts as met or missed and does not add to the total errors. The models that did not make the shortlist have automatic scores only: the shortlist. Gender neutrality: the Advanced requirements count the two best solutions of the language, with the gender-neutrality agent where they need it. The results of the other solutions are shown for information.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 11-02

Trade-offs in English to Malayalam translation

Trade-off

Two solutions meet every Standard requirement in Malayalam, and neither leads on errors, cost and time at once. The three-step solution (translation + LQA + repair) on OpenAI GPT-5.5 has 10.9 total errors per 1,000 words, against 18.8 for the two-step solution (translation + post-edit) on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. It costs $601 against $28.94 per million characters and takes 434 against 206 seconds per 1,000 words. Optimizing for quality selects OpenAI GPT-5.5, and for cost or latency Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Constraints

None of the solutions that meet every Basic requirement without the gender-neutrality agent cost or take less than the two-step one on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, $28.94 per million characters and 206 seconds per 1,000 words. None of the one-step solutions, real-time or not, meet even the Basic requirements. Of the two that meet every Standard requirement, a cost cap of at least $28.94 but under $601 per million characters, or a time limit of at least 206 but under 434 seconds per 1,000 words, leaves only the two-step one.

Agent effect

For the Advanced requirements, the gender-neutrality agent works with both solutions that meet every Standard requirement in Malayalam. On Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview the cost falls from $28.94 to $27.64 per million characters, the time rises from 206 to 213 seconds per 1,000 words, and total errors fall from 18.8 to 18.1 per 1,000 words. On OpenAI GPT-5.5 the cost rises from $601 to $1,014 per million characters and the time from 434 to 487 seconds per 1,000 words. Total errors rise from 10.9 to 11.2 per 1,000 words.

English to Malayalam translation quality levels

Optimize for
Basic requirements☆☆

Tier 2: two or more solutions, none simple

Solutions that meet them
2 (0 one-step)
Simplest solution
two-step
Fewest errors

OpenAI GPT-5.5
three-step

Total errors per 1,000 words
10.9
Cost per million characters
$601
Seconds per 1,000 words
434
Lowest cost

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
two-step

Total errors per 1,000 words
18.8
Cost per million characters
$28.94
Seconds per 1,000 words
206
Shortest time

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
two-step

Total errors per 1,000 words
18.8
Cost per million characters
$28.94
Seconds per 1,000 words
206
Standard requirements☆☆

Tier 2: two or more solutions, none simple

Solutions that meet them
2 (0 one-step)
Simplest solution
two-step
Fewest errors

OpenAI GPT-5.5
three-step

Total errors per 1,000 words
10.9
Cost per million characters
$601
Seconds per 1,000 words
434
Lowest cost

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
two-step

Total errors per 1,000 words
18.8
Cost per million characters
$28.94
Seconds per 1,000 words
206
Shortest time

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
two-step

Total errors per 1,000 words
18.8
Cost per million characters
$28.94
Seconds per 1,000 words
206
Advanced requirements☆☆

Tier 2: two or more solutions, none simple

Solutions that meet them
2 (0 one-step)
Simplest solution
with the gender-neutrality agent
Fewest errors

OpenAI GPT-5.5
three-step with the gender-neutrality agent

Total errors per 1,000 words
11.2
Cost per million characters
$1,014
Seconds per 1,000 words
487
Lowest cost

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
two-step with the gender-neutrality agent

Total errors per 1,000 words
18.1
Cost per million characters
$27.64
Seconds per 1,000 words
213
Shortest time

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
two-step with the gender-neutrality agent

Total errors per 1,000 words
18.1
Cost per million characters
$27.64
Seconds per 1,000 words
213

Optimize for selects one of the solutions that meet the level: the one with the fewest total errors, the lowest cost or the shortest time. Where no solution meets the level, the card shows the available solution with the fewest total errors and what it misses. Total errors count every requirement with countable errors.

Quality levelTierSolutionsSimplest solutionModelTotal errors per 1,000 wordsCost per million charactersSeconds per 1,000 words
BasicTier 2: two or more solutions, none simple☆☆two-stepGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview18.8$28.94206
StandardTier 2: two or more solutions, none simple☆☆two-stepGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview18.8$28.94206
AdvancedTier 2: two or more solutions, none simple☆☆with the gender-neutrality agentGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview18.1$27.64213

One solution per level: the simplest that meets the level, the cheapest of them where several are equally simple. ★ a one-step solution, ☆ a solution with more steps or the gender-neutrality agent.

Level step-up

The Standard requirements remove neither of the two solutions that meet every Basic requirement in Malayalam: the two-step solution (translation + post-edit) on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and the three-step solution (translation + LQA + repair) on OpenAI GPT-5.5. Meeting the Basic or the Standard requirements takes two steps at least. With the gender-neutrality agent, both also meet every Advanced requirement. At each level, optimizing for quality selects OpenAI GPT-5.5, and for cost or latency Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 11-02 · 08-09

English to Malayalam translation cost against errors

Chart data
Cost and weighted errors of the one-step solutions in Malayalam
ModelUS dollars per million charactersWeighted errors per 1,000 wordsGroup
Google Gemma 40.1551.7Misses a Standard requirement
DeepSeek V3.21.8939.2Misses a Standard requirement
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash3.8144.2Misses a Standard requirement
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview5.0925Misses a Standard requirement
z.ai GLM-57.0547.5Misses a Standard requirement
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol8.7816.8Misses a Standard requirement
Microsoft Translator10122.6Misses a Standard requirement
OpenAI GPT-5.512.630.7Misses a Standard requirement
Translated Lara 224.9938.2Misses a Standard requirement
DeepL Next Gen27.544.8Misses a Standard requirement
Price vs quality

Among the shortlisted one-step solutions in Malayalam, the two dearest do not have the fewest weighted errors. Those on Translated Lara 2 and DeepL Next Gen cost $24.99 and $27.50 per million characters and have 38.2 and 44.8 weighted errors per 1,000 words. Those on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol and Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cost $8.78 and $5.09 per million characters and have 16.8 and 25.0 weighted errors per 1,000 words. The one on Microsoft Translator costs $10 per million characters and has 122.6 weighted errors per 1,000 words.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 10-10

English to Malayalam translation requirements

Chart data
Errors per 1,000 words of the one-step solutions in Malayalam, median, by requirement
RequirementMedian errors per 1,000 words
General translation quality41.7
Gender neutrality2.1
Tag handling1.3
Tone of voice0

The requirements with countable errors. Every solution with its result on each requirement: the explorer.

Bottleneck

The one-step solutions on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol, Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and OpenAI GPT-5.5 come closest to the bar of general translation quality, with 16.8 to 30.7 weighted errors per 1,000 words and 4 or 5 major errors. The two-step solution (translation + post-edit) on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 16.8 weighted errors per 1,000 words and 1 major error, and the three-step one (translation + LQA + repair) on OpenAI GPT-5.5 has 9.2 and 1. Translations from the 7 shortlisted LLMs meet valid JSON and spacing at tag boundaries.

How we measure it: 09-09 · 09-10 · 09-11 · 09-12 · 09-18

AI models and MT engines for English to Malayalam translation

Chart data
Weighted errors per 1,000 words of the shortlisted one-step solutions in Malayalam
ModelWeighted errors per 1,000 words of the shortlisted one-step solutions in MalayalamClass
Microsoft Translator122.6MT engines
Google Gemma 451.7Open-weight LLMs
z.ai GLM-547.5LLMs
DeepL Next Gen44.8LLM-based MT engines
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash44.2LLMs
DeepSeek V3.239.2LLMs
Translated Lara 238.2LLM-based MT engines
OpenAI GPT-5.530.7LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview25LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol16.8LLMs

No translation into Malayalam: AI21 Jamba Large 1.7 (garbage or near-empty, cut off part-way, wrong script).

Model types

In one step in Malayalam, translations from the six shortlisted LLMs that are not open-weight have 16.8 to 47.5 weighted errors per 1,000 words. Those from Translated Lara 2 and DeepL Next Gen, the two shortlisted LLM-based MT engines, have 38.2 and 44.8, and those from the MT engine Microsoft Translator 122.6 weighted errors per 1,000 words. Translations from the open-weight Google Gemma 4 have the only critical error among the shortlisted one-step solutions. All 7 shortlisted LLMs support Malayalam by our measured criteria.

How we measure it: 00-04 · 08-15 · 23-01

How we shortlisted English to Malayalam translation solutions

Chart data
Ranks of the models on the two automatic metrics, Malayalam
ModelCOMET-KiwiRank on COMET-KiwiMetricXRank on MetricXShortlistedShortlist place
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)0.76791.4612NoNot shortlisted
Mistral Large 30.764111.419NoNot shortlisted
OpenAI GPT-4.10.758131.6915NoNot shortlisted
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.50.757141.6714NoNot shortlisted
ModernMT Enterprise Edition0.754151.4611NoNot shortlisted
Google Translation LLM0.748161.7916NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.60.745172.1120NoNot shortlisted
OpenAI gpt-oss-120b0.745181.8717NoNot shortlisted
Google Cloud Advanced Translation API0.740192.2923NoNot shortlisted
Mistral Medium 3.10.739202.1522NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.80.735212.5424NoNot shortlisted
Amazon Translate0.735222.0819NoNot shortlisted
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B0.731232.0518NoNot shortlisted
MiniMax M2.50.728242.1321NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Fable 50.728252.6726NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 50.725262.7827NoNot shortlisted
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-25090.710272.5625NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.50.696283.1630NoNot shortlisted
Yandex Cloud Translate v20.691292.9629NoNot shortlisted
NiuTrans0.679302.8028NoNot shortlisted
AppTek NMT0.597314.9931NoNot shortlisted
Alibaba Machine Translation API0.436328.5532NoNot shortlisted
Cohere Command A Translate0.4283311.6833NoNot shortlisted
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview0.78311.083YesTop 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol0.78221.052YesTop 8 by both metrics
DeepL Next Gen0.77931.184YesTop 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash0.77941.051YesTop 8 by both metrics
Google Gemma 40.77851.205YesTop 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.50.77661.336YesTop 8 by both metrics
DeepSeek V3.20.77471.347YesTop 8 by both metrics
z.ai GLM-50.77181.358YesTop 8 by both metrics
Translated Lara 20.766101.5813YesReal-time place
Microsoft Translator0.760121.4210YesReal-time place
ModelSolution complexityCOMET-Kiwi rankCOMET-KiwiMetricX rankMetricXShortlist
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewAdjusted LLM10.78331.08Top 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.6 SolAdjusted LLM20.78221.05Top 8 by both metrics
DeepL Next GenOff-the-shelf NMT30.77941.18Top 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.5 FlashAdjusted LLM40.77911.05Top 8 by both metrics
Google Gemma 4Adjusted LLM50.77851.20Top 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.5Adjusted LLM60.77661.33Top 8 by both metrics
DeepSeek V3.2Adjusted LLM70.77471.34Top 8 by both metrics
z.ai GLM-5Adjusted LLM80.77181.35Top 8 by both metrics
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)Adjusted LLM90.767121.46Not shortlisted
Translated Lara 2Adjusted NMT100.766131.58Real-time place
Mistral Large 3Adjusted LLM110.76491.41Not shortlisted
Microsoft TranslatorOff-the-shelf NMT120.760101.42Real-time place
OpenAI GPT-4.1Adjusted LLM130.758151.69Not shortlisted
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5Adjusted LLM140.757141.67Not shortlisted
ModernMT Enterprise EditionOff-the-shelf NMT150.754111.46Not shortlisted
Google Translation LLMAdjusted NMT160.748161.79Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6Adjusted LLM170.745202.11Not shortlisted
OpenAI gpt-oss-120bAdjusted LLM180.745171.87Not shortlisted
Google Cloud Advanced Translation APIOff-the-shelf NMT190.740232.29Not shortlisted
Mistral Medium 3.1Adjusted LLM200.739222.15Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8Adjusted LLM210.735242.54Not shortlisted
Amazon TranslateOff-the-shelf NMT220.735192.08Not shortlisted
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22BAdjusted LLM230.731182.05Not shortlisted
MiniMax M2.5Adjusted LLM240.728212.13Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Fable 5Adjusted LLM250.728262.67Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5Adjusted LLM260.725272.78Not shortlisted
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-2509Off-the-shelf LLM270.710252.56Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Off-the-shelf LLM280.696303.16Not shortlisted
Yandex Cloud Translate v2Off-the-shelf NMT290.691292.96Not shortlisted
NiuTransOff-the-shelf NMT300.679282.80Not shortlisted
AppTek NMTOff-the-shelf NMT310.597314.99Not shortlisted
Alibaba Machine Translation APIOff-the-shelf NMT320.436328.55Not shortlisted
Cohere Command A TranslateAdjusted LLM330.4283311.68Not shortlisted
OpenAI GPT-5.6 LunaAdjusted LLM—0.778—1.22Same model family as OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI GPT-5.6 TerraAdjusted LLM—0.773—1.26Same model family as OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)Adjusted LLM—0.765—1.51Same model family as xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)

Every model we got a translation from, as the shortlist compared it: off the shelf, without context in the request, or adjusted, with it. A model that did not make the shortlist is shown adjusted, unless off the shelf it scores higher by 0.03 or more on COMET-Kiwi. Ranks among 33 models, with each model family counted once, and the top 8 of each metric in bold. Higher is better on COMET-Kiwi, lower on MetricX. The scores rank models within this language and are not a requirement result.

Metrics vs LQA

COMET-Kiwi and MetricX both rank Google Gemma 4 fifth in Malayalam and OpenAI GPT-5.5 sixth. By Intento LQA, the one-step solution on Google Gemma 4 has 51.7 weighted errors per 1,000 words, the most of the shortlisted LLM solutions, and the one on OpenAI GPT-5.5 has 30.7. Nearest the cut in the tail are xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning), 9th on COMET-Kiwi and 12th on MetricX, and Mistral Large 3, 11th on COMET-Kiwi and 9th on MetricX.

How we measure it: 00-08 · 00-09

English to Malayalam translation cost

Quality levelCheapest solution that meets every requirement of the levelCost per million characters
BasicGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, two-step$28.94
StandardGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, two-step$28.94
AdvancedGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, two-step with the gender-neutrality agent$27.64
Chart data
Cost of the shortlisted one-step solutions in Malayalam
ModelUS dollars per million charactersClass
Google Gemma 4$0.15Open-weight LLMs
DeepSeek V3.2$1.89LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash$3.81LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$5.09LLMs
z.ai GLM-5$7.05LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol$8.78LLMs
Microsoft Translator$10MT engines
OpenAI GPT-5.5$12.6LLMs
Translated Lara 2$24.99LLM-based MT engines
DeepL Next Gen$27.5LLM-based MT engines
Chart data
Tokens per character of the translation into Malayalam, by model
ModelTokens per characterClass
Mistral Large 31.773LLMs
Mistral Medium 3.11.767LLMs
Cohere Command A Translate1.377LLMs
z.ai GLM-51.331LLMs
MiniMax M2.51.177LLMs
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B1.103Open-weight LLMs
Anthropic Claude Fable 50.984LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 50.983LLMs
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.80.982LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.60.96LLMs
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.50.955LLMs
DeepSeek V3.20.695LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)0.623LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)0.621LLMs
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.50.528LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.10.341LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol0.34LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra0.338LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.50.333LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna0.332LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash0.324LLMs
Google Gemma 40.324Open-weight LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview0.32LLMs
Cost driver

More tokens per character do not always make a one-step solution dearer in Malayalam. The tokenizer of z.ai GLM-5 produces 1.331 tokens per character of the translation, against 0.333 for OpenAI GPT-5.5, and the one-step solution on z.ai GLM-5 costs $7.05 per million characters, against $12.60. Meeting the Standard requirements costs no more than meeting the Basic ones, since the same two solutions meet both. The cheapest that meets every Advanced requirement, with the gender-neutrality agent, costs $27.64 per million characters.

How we measure it: 10-01 · 10-03 · 05-02

English to Malayalam translation speed

Quality levelFastest solution that meets every requirement of the levelSeconds per 1,000 words
BasicGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, two-step206
StandardGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, two-step206
AdvancedGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, two-step with the gender-neutrality agent213
Chart data
Time to translate 1,000 words into Malayalam, by model
ModelSeconds per 1,000 wordsClass
Google Cloud Advanced Translation API0.2MT engines
Microsoft Translator0.4MT engines
ModernMT Enterprise Edition0.5MT engines
DeepL Next Gen1.2LLM-based MT engines
Google Translation LLM1.3LLM-based MT engines
Amazon Translate1.7MT engines
Translated Lara 22.8LLM-based MT engines
OpenAI gpt-oss-120b2.8Open-weight LLMs
Yandex Cloud Translate v25.1MT engines
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna16LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash18LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.123LLMs
Alibaba Machine Translation API26MT engines
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)36LLMs
AppTek NMT39MT engines
NiuTrans59MT engines
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-250966Open-weight LLMs
Mistral Medium 3.172LLMs
DeepSeek V3.275LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra81LLMs
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.582LLMs
Cohere Command A Translate83LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)89LLMs
Mistral Large 3114LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview119LLMs
MiniMax M2.5129LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.5146LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol171LLMs
Google Gemma 4172Open-weight LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6174LLMs
Anthropic Claude Fable 5234LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5243LLMs
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5264LLMs
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8379LLMs
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B461Open-weight LLMs
z.ai GLM-5779LLMs

Real-time models are those the shortlist counts as real-time, under 2 seconds per text across the languages we timed. The chart shows the time of each model into Malayalam.

Real-time

Seven of the eight real-time models in Malayalam are MT engines or LLM-based MT engines, and the eighth is the open-weight OpenAI gpt-oss-120b. Of the eight, DeepL Next Gen, Microsoft Translator and Translated Lara 2 are on the shortlist, and translations from all three meet tone of voice. They have 44.8, 122.6 and 38.2 weighted errors per 1,000 words. Of the shortlisted LLMs, Google Gemini 3.5 Flash is the fastest, at 18 seconds per 1,000 words.

How we measure it: 12-01 · 12-02 · 12-09

Tone of voice and gender-neutral English to Malayalam translation

Tone of voice
Formal register, with നിങ്ങൾ
Gender-neutrality strategy
neutral rephrasing, honorific-plural + neutral nouns
Options in the language
gendered 3rd-person singular, honorific-plural neutral, rephrasing
Default gender
None where the source leaves the gender open
The two best solutionsSolutionSentences about people that are gender-neutralMeets every Advanced requirementCost per million charactersSeconds per 1,000 words
OpenAI GPT-5.5three-step, with the gender-neutrality agent100%✓$1,014487
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewtwo-step, with the gender-neutrality agent100%✓$27.64213
Analysis

For Malayalam we check the formal register, with നിങ്ങൾ, and gender-neutral wording through rephrasing, the honorific plural and neutral nouns, with no default gender. The options in Malayalam are the gendered third-person singular, a neutral honorific plural and rephrasing. We recorded no grammatical form in Malayalam that marks gender with no neutral form. With the gender-neutrality agent, 100% of the sentences about people in the translations from both of the two best solutions are gender-neutral.

How we measure it: 02-05 · 02-06 · 08-11 · 09-18

How confident are we in measuring English to Malayalam translation quality?

Confidence

In Malayalam the three LQA judges agree on a median of 94.7% of the sentences across the 10 shortlisted solutions. Both pairs of automatic metrics agree above the threshold, and neither agreement is borderline. So the Intento LQA error counts on this page and the shortlist ranks that rest on the metrics carry weight.

How we measure it: 00-07 · 07-05 · 09-02

Automate translation to meet your requirements

See Intento Language Hub in action.

Book a demo
Leave feedback