The State of Translation Automation 2026 · Languages

English to Slovenian AI translation quality, cost and speed

What it takes to automate translation from English into Slovenian against 10 requirements in three levels: the solutions that meet them, what they cost and how fast they are, from the 2026 benchmark of 57 AI models and MT engines.

How good is AI translation from English to Slovenian?

Key findings on English to Slovenian translation

  1. 1Level step-upThe solutions on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol meet every Basic requirement in Slovenian at $4.60 and $7.33 per million characters. Both miss formatting, so only the solutions on Anthropic Claude Fable 5 and OpenAI GPT-5.5 meet every Standard requirement.See the data →
  2. 2Metrics vs LQATranslations from DeepL Next Gen, first on both automatic metrics in Slovenian, have 20.1 weighted errors per 1,000 words by Intento LQA. Those from Anthropic Claude Fable 5, rank 4 on COMET-Kiwi and 8 on MetricX, have 10.9 weighted errors per 1,000 words, the fewest of the shortlisted one-step solutions.See the data →

Find English to Slovenian translation solutions for your requirements

Pick a quality level, or your own requirements, bars and constraints, to see the shortlisted solutions that meet them in Slovenian, with a column for each requirement you select. Under Optimize for, choose which of them comes first: the one with the fewest total errors, the lowest cost or the shortest time. Click a column heading to sort by it.

The shortlisted solutions on 13 models, with their Intento LQA results. Total errors per 1,000 words add the weighted general translation quality errors (minor 1, major 5, critical 10) to the missed glossary terms, sentences in the wrong register, tag errors and sentences that fail gender neutrality, each counted once. Formatting counts as met or missed and does not add to the total errors. The models that did not make the shortlist have automatic scores only: the shortlist. Gender neutrality: the Advanced requirements count the two best solutions of the language, with the gender-neutrality agent where they need it. The results of the other solutions are shown for information.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 11-02

Trade-offs in English to Slovenian translation

Trade-off

Neither of the two one-step solutions that meet every Standard requirement in Slovenian leads on errors, cost and time at once. The one on Anthropic Claude Fable 5 has 17.2 total errors per 1,000 words, costs $28.46 per million characters and takes 63 seconds per 1,000 words. The one on OpenAI GPT-5.5 has 26.5 total errors per 1,000 words, costs $10.61 per million characters and takes 55 seconds per 1,000 words. Optimize for selects the first for quality and the second for cost and latency.

Constraints

Under the Standard requirements, a cost cap of at most $10.60 per million characters or a time limit of at most 54 seconds per 1,000 words removes both solutions. Under the Basic ones, a cap of $4.59 per million characters or less leaves none. A real-time (<2 sec) limit removes every solution, since both real-time solutions on the shortlist, on DeepL Next Gen and Translated Lara 2, miss general translation quality. None of the one-step solutions meet every Advanced requirement.

Agent effect

With the gender-neutrality agent, the two-step solution (translation + post-edit) on OpenAI GPT-5.5 costs $49.13 per million characters, against $10.61 for the one-step solution on the same model. It takes 192 seconds per 1,000 words against 55, and its total errors fall from 26.5 to 18.1 per 1,000 words. On Anthropic Claude Fable 5, the three-step solution (translation + LQA + repair) with the agent takes 228 seconds per 1,000 words against 63, and its total errors fall from 17.2 to 8.9 per 1,000 words.

English to Slovenian translation quality levels

Optimize for
Basic requirements★★★★

Tier 1: simple solution + backup

Solutions that meet them
4 (4 one-step)
Simplest solution
one-step
Fewest errors

Anthropic Claude Fable 5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
17.2
Cost per million characters
$28.46
Seconds per 1,000 words
63
Lowest cost

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
24.5
Cost per million characters
$4.60
Seconds per 1,000 words
82
Shortest time

OpenAI GPT-5.5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
26.5
Cost per million characters
$10.61
Seconds per 1,000 words
55
Standard requirements★★

Tier 1: simple solution + backup

Solutions that meet them
2 (2 one-step)
Simplest solution
one-step
Fewest errors

Anthropic Claude Fable 5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
17.2
Cost per million characters
$28.46
Seconds per 1,000 words
63
Lowest cost

OpenAI GPT-5.5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
26.5
Cost per million characters
$10.61
Seconds per 1,000 words
55
Shortest time

OpenAI GPT-5.5
one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements

Total errors per 1,000 words
26.5
Cost per million characters
$10.61
Seconds per 1,000 words
55
Advanced requirements☆

Tier 3: one solution

Solutions that meet them
1 (0 one-step)
Simplest solution
with the gender-neutrality agent
Fewest errors

OpenAI GPT-5.5
two-step with the gender-neutrality agent

Total errors per 1,000 words
18.1
Cost per million characters
$49.13
Seconds per 1,000 words
192
Lowest cost

OpenAI GPT-5.5
two-step with the gender-neutrality agent

Total errors per 1,000 words
18.1
Cost per million characters
$49.13
Seconds per 1,000 words
192
Shortest time

OpenAI GPT-5.5
two-step with the gender-neutrality agent

Total errors per 1,000 words
18.1
Cost per million characters
$49.13
Seconds per 1,000 words
192

Optimize for selects one of the solutions that meet the level: the one with the fewest total errors, the lowest cost or the shortest time. Where no solution meets the level, the card shows the available solution with the fewest total errors and what it misses. Total errors count every requirement with countable errors.

Quality levelTierSolutionsSimplest solutionModelTotal errors per 1,000 wordsCost per million charactersSeconds per 1,000 words
BasicTier 1: simple solution + backup★×4one-stepGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview24.5$4.6082
StandardTier 1: simple solution + backup★★one-stepOpenAI GPT-5.526.5$10.6155
AdvancedTier 3: one solution☆with the gender-neutrality agentOpenAI GPT-5.518.1$49.13192

One solution per level: the simplest that meets the level, the cheapest of them where several are equally simple. ★ a one-step solution, ☆ a solution with more steps or the gender-neutrality agent.

Level step-up

Under the Basic requirements, Optimize for selects the solution on Anthropic Claude Fable 5 for quality, the one on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for cost and the one on OpenAI GPT-5.5 for latency. The Standard requirements remove the solutions on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol, which miss formatting, so Optimize for selects the one on OpenAI GPT-5.5 for cost as well. The one solution that meets every Advanced requirement takes two steps with the gender-neutrality agent, so Optimize for selects it for all three.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 11-02 · 08-09

English to Slovenian translation cost against errors

Chart data
Cost and weighted errors of the one-step solutions in Slovenian
ModelUS dollars per million charactersWeighted errors per 1,000 wordsGroup
DeepSeek V3.20.9732.3Misses a Standard requirement
z.ai GLM-52.0143.8Misses a Standard requirement
OpenAI GPT-4.12.9542.2Misses a Standard requirement
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash3.4426.4Misses a Standard requirement
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview4.617.5Misses a Standard requirement
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 55.744.8Misses a Standard requirement
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.66.2729.3Misses a Standard requirement
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol7.3318.8Misses a Standard requirement
OpenAI GPT-5.510.6118.8Meets every Standard requirement
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.814.3320.4Misses a Standard requirement
Translated Lara 224.9925.4Misses a Standard requirement
DeepL Next Gen27.520.1Misses a Standard requirement
Anthropic Claude Fable 528.4610.9Meets every Standard requirement
Price vs quality

The one-step solution on Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $4.60 per million characters and has 17.5 weighted errors per 1,000 words, but misses formatting. Of the one-step solutions that cost more, only the one on Anthropic Claude Fable 5, the dearest at $28.46 per million characters, has fewer, 10.9 weighted errors per 1,000 words. The solutions on OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol and OpenAI GPT-5.5 have 18.8 weighted errors per 1,000 words each, at $7.33 and $10.61 per million characters.

How we measure it: 11-01 · 10-10

English to Slovenian translation requirements

Chart data
Errors per 1,000 words of the one-step solutions in Slovenian, median, by requirement
RequirementMedian errors per 1,000 words
General translation quality25.4
Gender neutrality7.7
Tone of voice0
Tag handling0

The requirements with countable errors. Every solution with its result on each requirement: the explorer.

Near miss

Two solutions miss general translation quality by a small margin in Slovenian. Translations from DeepL Next Gen have 20.1 weighted errors per 1,000 words and those from Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 have 20.4. Tag handling has near misses too. Translations from Translated Lara 2 have 99.8% of the tags right, and those from Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 have 99.2%. All four solutions that meet general translation quality also meet tag handling.

How we measure it: 09-09 · 09-10 · 09-11 · 09-12 · 09-18

AI models and MT engines for English to Slovenian translation

Chart data
Weighted errors per 1,000 words of the shortlisted one-step solutions in Slovenian
ModelWeighted errors per 1,000 words of the shortlisted one-step solutions in SlovenianClass
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 544.8LLMs
z.ai GLM-543.8LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.142.2LLMs
DeepSeek V3.232.3LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.629.3LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash26.4LLMs
Translated Lara 225.4LLM-based MT engines
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.820.4LLMs
DeepL Next Gen20.1LLM-based MT engines
OpenAI GPT-5.518.8LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol18.8LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview17.5LLMs
Anthropic Claude Fable 510.9LLMs

No translation into Slovenian: SpeakLeash Bielik-11B-v3.0-Instruct (wrong language), Widn AI Tower Anthill (far too short, wrong language), Widn AI Tower Vesuvius (far too short, wrong language).

Model types

The four solutions that meet general translation quality in Slovenian are all LLMs, with 10.9 to 18.8 weighted errors per 1,000 words. Translations from the two LLM-based MT engines on the shortlist, DeepL Next Gen and Translated Lara 2, have 20.1 and 25.4 weighted errors per 1,000 words, and those from the other LLMs 20.4 to 44.8. All 11 shortlisted LLMs support Slovenian by our measured criteria. What we got from SpeakLeash Bielik-11B-v3.0-Instruct, Widn AI Tower Anthill and Widn AI Tower Vesuvius was in the wrong language.

How we measure it: 00-04 · 08-15 · 23-01

How we shortlisted English to Slovenian translation solutions

Chart data
Ranks of the models on the two automatic metrics, Slovenian
ModelCOMET-KiwiRank on COMET-KiwiMetricXRank on MetricXShortlistedShortlist place
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)0.809101.2415NoNot shortlisted
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.50.808131.2517NoNot shortlisted
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-25090.804161.1911NoNot shortlisted
Mistral Large 30.803171.2818NoNot shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.50.802181.3423NoNot shortlisted
Tilde TildeOpen LLM engine0.800191.2819NoNot shortlisted
Microsoft Translator0.800201.2516NoNot shortlisted
ModernMT Enterprise Edition0.797211.2314NoNot shortlisted
Google Translation LLM0.795221.7234NoNot shortlisted
Google Gemma 40.791231.3726NoNot shortlisted
MiniMax M2.50.790241.3524NoNot shortlisted
Cohere Command A Translate0.786251.3322NoNot shortlisted
OpenAI gpt-oss-120b0.784261.2920NoNot shortlisted
Supertext LLM0.784271.4728NoNot shortlisted
NiuTrans0.782281.4727NoNot shortlisted
Mistral Medium 3.10.781291.3021NoNot shortlisted
Google Cloud Advanced Translation API0.781302.0036NoNot shortlisted
Cohere Tiny Aya0.778311.6331NoNot shortlisted
Amazon Translate0.777321.6533NoNot shortlisted
SYSTRAN PNMT API0.765331.6432NoNot shortlisted
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B0.764341.6330NoNot shortlisted
Yandex Cloud Translate v20.745351.8935NoNot shortlisted
AI21 Jamba Large 1.70.744361.5129NoNot shortlisted
Alibaba Machine Translation API0.660373.1537NoNot shortlisted
AppTek NMT0.616385.7938NoNot shortlisted
DeepL Next Gen0.82011.091YesTop 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview0.81921.112YesTop 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash0.81631.123YesTop 8 by both metrics
Anthropic Claude Fable 50.81541.178YesTop 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol0.81451.189YesTop 8 by COMET-Kiwi
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.80.81461.2012YesTop 8 by COMET-Kiwi
OpenAI GPT-5.50.81371.2113YesTop 8 by COMET-Kiwi
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 50.81381.1810YesTop 8 by COMET-Kiwi
Translated Lara 20.80991.3625YesReal-time place
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.60.808111.166YesTop 8 by MetricX
OpenAI GPT-4.10.808121.167YesTop 8 by MetricX
z.ai GLM-50.807141.144YesTop 8 by MetricX
DeepSeek V3.20.807151.155YesTop 8 by MetricX
ModelSolution complexityCOMET-Kiwi rankCOMET-KiwiMetricX rankMetricXShortlist
DeepL Next GenOff-the-shelf NMT10.82011.09Top 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewAdjusted LLM20.81921.11Top 8 by both metrics
Google Gemini 3.5 FlashAdjusted LLM30.81631.12Top 8 by both metrics
Anthropic Claude Fable 5Adjusted LLM40.81581.17Top 8 by both metrics
OpenAI GPT-5.6 SolAdjusted LLM50.81491.18Top 8 by COMET-Kiwi
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8Adjusted LLM60.814121.20Top 8 by COMET-Kiwi
OpenAI GPT-5.5Adjusted LLM70.813131.21Top 8 by COMET-Kiwi
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5Adjusted LLM80.813101.18Top 8 by COMET-Kiwi
Translated Lara 2Adjusted NMT90.809251.36Real-time place
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)Adjusted LLM100.809151.24Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6Adjusted LLM110.80861.16Top 8 by MetricX
OpenAI GPT-4.1Adjusted LLM120.80871.16Top 8 by MetricX
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5Adjusted LLM130.808171.25Not shortlisted
z.ai GLM-5Adjusted LLM140.80741.14Top 8 by MetricX
DeepSeek V3.2Adjusted LLM150.80751.15Top 8 by MetricX
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-2509Adjusted LLM160.804111.19Not shortlisted
Mistral Large 3Adjusted LLM170.803181.28Not shortlisted
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Adjusted LLM180.802231.34Not shortlisted
Tilde TildeOpen LLM engineAdjusted NMT190.800191.28Not shortlisted
Microsoft TranslatorOff-the-shelf NMT200.800161.25Not shortlisted
ModernMT Enterprise EditionOff-the-shelf NMT210.797141.23Not shortlisted
Google Translation LLMAdjusted NMT220.795341.72Not shortlisted
Google Gemma 4Adjusted LLM230.791261.37Not shortlisted
MiniMax M2.5Adjusted LLM240.790241.35Not shortlisted
Cohere Command A TranslateAdjusted LLM250.786221.33Not shortlisted
OpenAI gpt-oss-120bAdjusted LLM260.784201.29Not shortlisted
Supertext LLMOff-the-shelf NMT270.784281.47Not shortlisted
NiuTransOff-the-shelf NMT280.782271.47Not shortlisted
Mistral Medium 3.1Adjusted LLM290.781211.30Not shortlisted
Google Cloud Advanced Translation APIOff-the-shelf NMT300.781362.00Not shortlisted
Cohere Tiny AyaOff-the-shelf LLM310.778311.63Not shortlisted
Amazon TranslateOff-the-shelf NMT320.777331.65Not shortlisted
SYSTRAN PNMT APIOff-the-shelf NMT330.765321.64Not shortlisted
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22BAdjusted LLM340.764301.63Not shortlisted
Yandex Cloud Translate v2Off-the-shelf NMT350.745351.89Not shortlisted
AI21 Jamba Large 1.7Adjusted LLM360.744291.51Not shortlisted
Alibaba Machine Translation APIOff-the-shelf NMT370.660373.15Not shortlisted
AppTek NMTOff-the-shelf NMT380.616385.79Not shortlisted
OpenAI GPT-5.6 LunaAdjusted LLM—0.811—1.16Same model family as OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI GPT-5.6 TerraAdjusted LLM—0.813—1.17Same model family as OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)Adjusted LLM—0.807—1.26Same model family as xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)

Every model we got a translation from, as the shortlist compared it: off the shelf, without context in the request, or adjusted, with it. A model that did not make the shortlist is shown adjusted, unless off the shelf it scores higher by 0.03 or more on COMET-Kiwi. Ranks among 38 models, with each model family counted once, and the top 8 of each metric in bold. Higher is better on COMET-Kiwi, lower on MetricX. The scores rank models within this language and are not a requirement result.

Metrics vs LQA

OpenAI GPT-5.5 is on the shortlist through COMET-Kiwi alone, rank 7 against 13 on MetricX, and its solution meets every Standard requirement. None of the four solutions on the list through MetricX alone meet general translation quality. Translations from z.ai GLM-5, DeepSeek V3.2, Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 and OpenAI GPT-4.1, ranks 4 to 7 on MetricX, have 29.3 to 43.8 weighted errors per 1,000 words. Nearest the cut in the tail are xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning), rank 10 on COMET-Kiwi, and Swiss AI Apertus-8B-2509, rank 11 on MetricX.

How we measure it: 00-08 · 00-09

English to Slovenian translation cost

Quality levelCheapest solution that meets every requirement of the levelCost per million characters
BasicGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements$4.60
StandardOpenAI GPT-5.5, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements$10.61
AdvancedOpenAI GPT-5.5, two-step with the gender-neutrality agent$49.13
Chart data
Cost of the shortlisted one-step solutions in Slovenian
ModelUS dollars per million charactersClass
DeepSeek V3.2$0.97LLMs
z.ai GLM-5$2.01LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.1$2.95LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash$3.44LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$4.6LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5$5.7LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6$6.27LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol$7.33LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.5$10.61LLMs
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8$14.33LLMs
Translated Lara 2$24.99LLM-based MT engines
DeepL Next Gen$27.5LLM-based MT engines
Anthropic Claude Fable 5$28.46LLMs
Chart data
Tokens per character of the translation into Slovenian, by model
ModelTokens per characterClass
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.80.484LLMs
Anthropic Claude Fable 50.483LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 50.483LLMs
Mistral Medium 3.10.419LLMs
AI21 Jamba Large 1.70.415LLMs
Mistral Large 30.415LLMs
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B0.38Open-weight LLMs
DeepSeek V3.20.371LLMs
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.50.369LLMs
z.ai GLM-50.368LLMs
Cohere Command A Translate0.36LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.60.357LLMs
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.50.354LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash0.328LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview0.327LLMs
Google Gemma 40.326Open-weight LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)0.323LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)0.323LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.10.306LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra0.306LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna0.305LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.50.304LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol0.304LLMs
MiniMax M2.50.3LLMs
Cohere Tiny Aya0.291LLMs
Cost driver

The tokenizers produce a median 0.35 tokens per character of Slovenian, 1.4 times the tokens per character of the English source. The tokenizers of Anthropic Claude Fable 5 and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5 both produce 0.48 tokens per character, yet the one-step solutions on them cost $28.46 and $5.70 per million characters. The cheapest solution costs $4.60 per million characters under the Basic requirements, $10.61 under the Standard ones and $49.13 under the Advanced ones, where it takes two steps with the gender-neutrality agent.

How we measure it: 10-01 · 10-03 · 05-02

English to Slovenian translation speed

Quality levelFastest solution that meets every requirement of the levelSeconds per 1,000 words
BasicOpenAI GPT-5.5, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements55
StandardOpenAI GPT-5.5, one-step LLM adjusted for Standard requirements55
AdvancedOpenAI GPT-5.5, two-step with the gender-neutrality agent192
Chart data
Time to translate 1,000 words into Slovenian, by model
ModelSeconds per 1,000 wordsClass
Microsoft Translator0.2MT engines
ModernMT Enterprise Edition0.3MT engines
Google Cloud Advanced Translation API0.4MT engines
DeepL Next Gen0.7LLM-based MT engines
Google Translation LLM0.9LLM-based MT engines
Translated Lara 21.2LLM-based MT engines
Amazon Translate1.2MT engines
SYSTRAN PNMT API1.7MT engines
OpenAI gpt-oss-120b2.3Open-weight LLMs
Yandex Cloud Translate v22.9MT engines
Tilde TildeOpen LLM engine6.8LLM-based MT engines
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna15LLMs
Google Gemini 3.5 Flash16LLMs
Supertext LLM16LLM-based MT engines
xAI Grok 4.20 (non-reasoning)16LLMs
Cohere Tiny Aya19LLMs
OpenAI GPT-4.125LLMs
Alibaba Machine Translation API26MT engines
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra29LLMs
xAI Grok 4.20 (reasoning)34LLMs
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.535LLMs
MiniMax M2.549LLMs
Mistral Medium 3.149LLMs
Swiss AI Apertus-8B-250950Open-weight LLMs
Cohere Command A Translate53LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.555LLMs
NiuTrans55MT engines
Mistral Large 360LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 562LLMs
Anthropic Claude Fable 563LLMs
AI21 Jamba Large 1.764LLMs
DeepSeek V3.265LLMs
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.668LLMs
OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol72LLMs
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.878LLMs
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview82LLMs
AppTek NMT96MT engines
Alibaba Qwen3-235B-A22B132Open-weight LLMs
Google Gemma 4158Open-weight LLMs
z.ai GLM-5214LLMs
MoonshotAI Kimi K2.5261LLMs

Real-time models are those the shortlist counts as real-time, under 2 seconds per text across the languages we timed. The chart shows the time of each model into Slovenian.

Real-time

Of the nine real-time models in Slovenian, eight are MT engines or LLM-based MT engines, and the other is the open-weight OpenAI gpt-oss-120b, which is not on the shortlist. The two real-time solutions on the shortlist, on DeepL Next Gen and Translated Lara 2, miss general translation quality, with 20.1 and 25.4 weighted errors per 1,000 words. The solutions that meet every Standard requirement take 55 and 63 seconds per 1,000 words, and the one that meets every Advanced requirement takes 192 seconds per 1,000 words.

How we measure it: 12-01 · 12-02 · 12-09

Tone of voice and gender-neutral English to Slovenian translation

Tone of voice
Formal register, with vi (vikanje)
Gender-neutrality strategy
neutral rephrasing + impersonals
Options in the language
generic masculine, feminine pairing or slash forms, neutral rephrasing
The two best solutionsSolutionSentences about people that are gender-neutralMeets every Advanced requirementCost per million charactersSeconds per 1,000 words
Anthropic Claude Fable 5three-step, with the gender-neutrality agent97.3%✗$1,032228
OpenAI GPT-5.5two-step, with the gender-neutrality agent100%✓$49.13192
Agent effect

For tone of voice in Slovenian we check the formal register, with vi (vikanje) as the form of address. For gender neutrality we check neutral rephrasing and impersonal forms. None of the 13 shortlisted one-step solutions meet gender neutrality, with a median of 7.7 gender-neutrality errors per 1,000 words. With the gender-neutrality agent, 100% of the sentences about people are gender-neutral in the translations from the two-step solution (translation + post-edit) on OpenAI GPT-5.5.

How we measure it: 02-05 · 02-06 · 08-11 · 09-18

How confident are we in measuring English to Slovenian translation quality?

Confidence

The three LQA judges agree on a median of 97.2% of the sentences of the shortlisted solutions in Slovenian, so the Intento LQA results on this page carry weight. With both pairs of automatic metrics in agreement, the ranking that built the shortlist carries weight too. The automatic scores only rank the models for the shortlist, and the weighted errors on this page come from Intento LQA.

How we measure it: 00-07 · 07-05 · 09-02

Automate translation to meet your requirements

See Intento Language Hub in action.

Book a demo
Leave feedback